Date: 2015-01-09 07:12 pm (UTC)
I like it. You draw nice fine lines between maths and sorcery, technology and free will. The prospect of having certain feedback loops that can compel you to think in certain ways is terrifying enough, but the notion of doing it to obliterate different opinions is so very topical to certain aspects of the voting systems many countries use now. Would they be able to recognize that they did not agree with their own consensus after the fact, or would that imprint stay with them? Could they face the scorn of an outraged public after consensus ended?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jexia: (Default)
jexia

April 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 02:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios